So 300 people took the survey but only 181 responses were counted? And the sample was tiny, research was paid for by the people it "benefits" and survey stated 7 days before the results were published?
No university in the country would accept this as research.
I came here looking for more info because the yes campaign ads are quoting Financial Review as their source. Almost like they don't want to say "from a study of 300 that we paid for and where 120 responses weren't counted despite there only being 2 options".
Not a single one of my Aboriginal friends is talking about voting yes.
As I've said many times on Facebook, skewed and conflated statistics like the 80% support being advertised everywhere just damage the cause.
So 300 people took the survey but only 181 responses were counted? And the sample was tiny, research was paid for by the people it "benefits" and survey stated 7 days before the results were published?
No university in the country would accept this as research.
I came here looking for more info because the yes campaign ads are quoting Financial Review as their source. Almost like they don't want to say "from a study of 300 that we paid for and where 120 responses weren't counted despite there only being 2 options".
Not a single one of my Aboriginal friends is talking about voting yes.
As I've said many times on Facebook, skewed and conflated statistics like the 80% support being advertised everywhere just damage the cause.